Considerations for Transitioning from BIMS to MOSIP*
A Modernization Strategy
Prepared for UNHCR
Why Transition?
| BIMS Challenges |
|---|
| - High maintenance costs - Performance bottlenecks and scalability issues - Limited testing capabilities - Vendor lock-in (partial) |
|
|
| MOSIP Benefits |
|---|
| - Open-source and modular - Scalable biometric management - Cost-effective implementation - Interoperability - Standards Compliant |
|
|
Key Transition Considerations
Efficient Biometric Synchronization
- Real-time syncing between field & central servers
- Offline mode with sync-on-connectivity
- Incremental updates to reduce bandwidth usage
Migration Challenges
- Standardizing biometric interfaces
- Ensuring batch processing efficiency
- Training & adoption for field teams
- Biometric Storage and Quality
- Workflow
Registration / Adjudication Client
- Integration to existing client
- New design?
- Security and Vulnerability
Possible Roadmap for Implementation
| Phase | Action Items | Key Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Assess BIMS architecture, workflow & sync needs | Identify technical gaps |
| Phase 2 | Pilot MOSIP for refugee biometric enrollments | Validate performance |
| Phase 3 | Develop synchronization mechanisms | Ensure seamless data updates |
| Phase 4 | Full-scale Migration | Sunset BIMS, transition to MOSIP |
Conclusion & Next Steps
Proposed Next Steps:
- Scoping workflow and sync changes for MOSIP.
- Establish a working group
UNHCR and MOSIP
By Ted Dunstone
