title: Ensuring AI Reliability & Safety theme: white transition: slide class: center, middle

Supporting APS Agencies

Reliability & Safety in AI Systems

How BixeLab Assists Under the AI Assurance Framework – Section 5

Our Role as a Test Lab

At BixeLab, we help APS agencies evaluate and assure:

  • AI reliability under real-world conditions
  • Data suitability and traceability
  • System safety, fairness, and accountability

Aligned with:
✅ AI Assurance Framework
✅ GovAI platform
✅ AI Technical Standards

5.1 Data Suitability – How We Help

We assess data quality to ensure it is fit for purpose:
🔹 Accuracy, completeness, and consistency
🔹 Provenance, lineage, and labelling integrity
🔹 Volume sufficiency for reliable performance

✅ We provide structured data suitability reports
✅ We flag risks in training, testing, and evaluation datasets

5.2 Indigenous Data – How We Help

When systems involve Indigenous data or impact Indigenous peoples:
🔹 We advise on technical alignment with the Framework for Governance of Indigenous Data
🔹 We work with cultural governance experts to inform test protocols
🔹 We identify risks of misrepresentation or misuse

✅ We assist with evidence for ethical compliance and respectful design

5.3 Suitability of Procured Models – How We Help

If you're using open-source, vendor, or custom models:
🔹 We run external benchmarking and stress testing
🔹 We identify known model limitations and architecture risks
🔹 We validate documentation, versioning, and traceability

✅ Independent suitability assessments for procurement or reuse
✅ Support model selection in the ICT Investment Process

5.4 Testing – How We Help

We design and execute testing aligned with APS use cases:
🔹 Functional testing and performance benchmarking
🔹 Bias and edge-case evaluations
🔹 Liveness detection and spoof resistance (for biometric AI)

✅ We deliver test plans, traceable results, and corrective guidance
✅ Testing against APS standards, ISO/IEC, NIST

5.5 Pilots – How We Help

🔹 We support pre-deployment pilots with sandbox or live-in-field testing
🔹 We help agencies evaluate:

  • Stability
  • Failover handling
  • Feedback mechanisms
    🔹 We assist with pilot planning and lessons-learned reviews

✅ Pilot outcome analysis & system refinement guidance

5.6 Monitoring – How We Help

We help define monitoring frameworks for APS operations:
🔹 KPIs for drift, failure rates, demographic discrepancies
🔹 Threshold setting and alerting mechanisms
🔹 Re-validation triggers and audit log requirements

✅ Custom monitoring plans tailored to agency risk appetite
✅ Integration with BAU assurance cycles

5.7 Human Oversight & Disengagement – How We Help

🔹 We define safe fallback and disengagement pathways
🔹 We review decision traceability and override protocols
🔹 We validate human-in-the-loop controls

✅ Structured playbooks for intervention readiness
✅ Assist with documentation for contestability & accountability

Summary: Where We Add Value

Element Our Contribution
Data Suitability Structured evaluation and risk analysis
Indigenous Data Technical & ethical assurance
Model Suitability Independent testing and benchmarking
Testing End-to-end scenario-based assessments
Pilot Real-world validation and adjustments
Monitoring Operational risk detection frameworks
Disengagement Oversight, intervention and safety plans

Let’s Work Together

We help APS teams build AI systems that are reliable, fair, and ready for public service.
📍 Based in Canberra
📐 ISO/NIST-aligned methods
🔍 Trusted by governments globally

Text

Copy of Biometrics for Foundational ID

By Ted Dunstone

Copy of Biometrics for Foundational ID

  • 6