Considerations for ABIS Hardware Procurement
Strategic Implications of Procuring Hardware Before ABIS Vendor Selection
Context
- Government aims to procure ABIS hardware to support matching for the Indonesian population.
- Tender is hardware-only: excludes ABIS software and data migration.
- Scope is matching compute only, not database infrastructure.
Key Concern
Should hardware be procured before the ABIS vendor is selected?
➡️ Delaying procurement enables better alignment, lower risk, and cost efficiency.
Issue 1: Vendor-Specific Requirements
- ABIS architectures vary:
- Some require GPU acceleration (e.g., NVIDIA CUDA).
- Others are optimized for CPU-only.
- Early procurement risks hardware–software misalignment.
Issue 2: Sizing and Efficiency
- Using legacy (L1) sizing may over-provision:
- Hardware has improved dramatically.
- Modern ABIS systems are more efficient.
- GPU-based ABIS may require fewer servers.
Issue 3: Risk of Wasted Investment
- Early hardware lock-in can:
- Constrain vendor choice.
- Lead to underutilized or incompatible infrastructure.
- Potential for wasted public funds.
Issue 4: Limited Repurposing Options
- High-spec biometric compute clusters are not easily reused:
- Availability and isolation needs differ.
- Risk of idle resources if misaligned.
Recommendation: Delay Procurement
✅ Benefits of delaying hardware procurement:
- Align specs to real vendor requirements
- Reduce overprovisioning and cost
- Enable GPU-accelerated or hybrid architecture
- Avoid unnecessary constraints and risk
If Delay Is Not Feasible
🛠 Mitigation strategies:
- Declare hardware general-purpose in tender
- Use modular, flexible specs
- Include hybrid CPU + limited GPU support
- Consult ABIS vendors informally on sizing assumptions
Comparison Table
Criteria | Procure Now | Procure After Vendor Selection |
---|---|---|
Compatibility Risk | High | Low |
Cost Efficiency | Lower | Higher |
Future-Proofing | Low | High |
Risk of Vendor Bias | High | Low |
Hardware Utilization | Uncertain | Aligned |
Repurposability | Limited | Irrelevant |
Final Thoughts
- Aligning procurement with vendor selection is strategic and cost-effective.
- Delay if possible to ensure right-sizing and optimal performance.
- If not feasible, apply flexible and consultative procurement practices.
Copy of BQAT Gates Presentation
By Ted Dunstone
Copy of BQAT Gates Presentation
- 7