Biometric Analysis and Simulation Insight System (BASIS)
Modelling the Effects of Biometric Design Choices
Dr. Ted Dunstone — BixeLab / Biometix
Purpose
- Demonstrate how biometric system design choices affect real-world outcomes.
- Bridge technical metrics (accuracy, thresholds, modalities) with population-level impacts (enrolment success, fraud, inclusion).
- Provide an interactive teaching and decision support tool for governments, standards bodies, and system integrators.
Why It Matters
- Biometric performance depends on more than algorithms — it’s shaped by:
- Population composition (rural vs. urban, ageing, diversity)
- System configuration (thresholds, fusion rules)
- Transaction scale and fraud pressure
- Quantifying these factors clarifies trade-offs between:
- Security (false accepts, fraud)
- Usability (false rejects)
- Inclusion (failure to enrol)
What the Simulator Does Now
Simulation Inputs
- Population size, annual growth, transaction volume
- Segment profiles (urban/rural, fraud rate, FTE rate)
- Biometric modalities: Face, Fingerprint, Iris
- Score distributions modelled with Gaussian or Poisson processes
- Adjustable thresholds and fusion rules
Outputs and Visualisations
- Score Histograms: genuine vs impostor distributions
- ROC Curves: TPR vs FPR across thresholds
- Threshold Tables: matching rates, FRR/FAR per setting
-
Annual Metrics:
- People unable to enrol
- Fraud attempts and successes
- Population growth and transaction volume
Example Insights
- Effect of raising the threshold on:
- Security ↑, Inclusion ↓
- Rural users experience slightly higher error rates → potential for bias visualisation
- Fraud rate sensitivity: high FPR thresholds can amplify real-world exposure
Implementation Overview
- Built with Dash + Mantine Components for interactive web UI
- Modular simulation core in Python (NumPy / pandas)
- Generates reproducible results (seeded random number generator)
- Outputs interactive graphs and CSV tables for export
Potential Enhancements
Analytical Extensions
- Add 1:N Identification mode (FPIR/TPIR modelling)
- Multi-year cohort enrolment tracking
- Correlated multimodal fusion (Gaussian copula)
- Introduce cost functions and optimal operating point detection
User Experience
- Interactive Dash dashboard with live parameter sliders
- Scenario comparison mode for “what-if” analysis
- Integration with real score data for calibration
- Add equity and fairness dashboards by segment and demographic
Research and Policy Applications
- Support ISO/IEC 19795 and 29794 test planning
- Model impacts for digital identity inclusion programs (e.g., MOSIP, ID4D)
- Train policymakers on trade-offs between accuracy, risk, and accessibility
Summary
| Category | Current | Future |
|---|---|---|
| Modalities | Face, Fingerprint, Iris | Voice, Multi-modal Fusion |
| Stats Model | Gaussian, Poisson | Mixture Models, Empirical |
| Metrics | ROC, FTE, Fraud | Cost/Benefit, Fairness, Equity |
| Interface | Dash Mantine | Multi-scenario, Web-shareable |
| Purpose | Demonstration & Education | Policy Simulation & Standards Testing |
Next Steps
- Update documentation and planning
- Enhance alpha build
- Validate with empirical datasets
- Package as open educational tool for biometric standards training
- Connect to real operational data for parameter import
- Publish under open-source licence (e.g., MIT)
Thank You
Biometric System Impact Simulator
📍 BixeLab | Biometix
💡 Exploring performance, inclusion & trust in identity systems
Biometric Analysis and Simulation Insight System
By Ted Dunstone
Biometric Analysis and Simulation Insight System
- 143