*chto@uchicago.edu

Cosmological constraints from joint analyses of clusters, galaxies, and weak lensing

Chun-Hao To*,  DES cluster working group

Galaxy Cluster physics 

Dark Matter Halo

~

5\times 10^{14} M_\odot

Red galaxies

~ 2% of the mass

Hot gas

~ 10% of the mass

Nihar Dalal's talk

Cosmology

Galaxy physics

Baryonic feedback

Yang+03, Lin&Mohr04, More+16,
Kravstov+18, Shin+19, To+20 (APJ 897,15), ... many more

Vikhlinin+06, Eckert+16,
To+24 (JCAP 2024, 037), Dalal+25, Kovac+25, Siegel+25, ...many more

Clusters 

Dark Matter Halo:
Rare peaks in the density field.

 

250 Mpc/h

Cluster Cosmology  

Dark Matter Halo:
Rare peaks in the density field.

 

     Abundances are exponentially sensitive to the amount of structure.
 

More structures

Bahcall 95, Wang&Steinhardt 98,  Borgani+ 01, Allen+ 03, Vikhlinin+ 09, DeHann+16, To+ 21, Bocquet+24,... many more

Invisible

Cluster Cosmology  

Text

Cluster mass

Cluster Cosmology  

Bocquet+24 (SPT), Ghirardina+24 (eROSITA), Mantz+14 (WtG),... many many more

Cluster Cosmology  

~6500 clusters found in DES Y1

Cluster Cosmology  

DES+20

Photo-z uncertainty at z=0.2 ~= 100 Mpc/h

  • Optical clusters have 20-30 % contributions from line-of-sight galaxies.
     
  • Modeling these components (and their impact on the weak lensing profile) is essential for unbiased cluster cosmology.  

To+21 (MNRAS 502,4093) , Lee+22, Wu+22, Zhang+23, and many more

How should we proceed?

 

 

How should we proceed?

  • Clusters are really part of the large-scale structure.

How should we proceed?

  • Clusters are really part of the large-scale structure.
     
  • Analyze clusters in the same way as galaxies.

Why do we want to make it even more complicated? 

Why do we want to make it even more complicated? 

Adding more data makes modeling simpler:

  • Focusing on large scales where we can model the data perturbatively (>0.2 Mpc/h vs >8 Mpc/h).
     
  • Self-calibrating projection effects.
     
  • Easily integrated into joint analyses. 

Reanalysis of DES-Y1 data

Large-scale only reanalysis

DES-Y1 clusters

To&Krause+ 21 (PRL, 126, 141301)

DES Y1

DES Y3 (>16k clusters)

DES Y3 clusters are unique

Merloni+24, Kornoelje+25, DES+25, see also ACTDESHSC Collaboration+25 (ACT DR6) 

[SPT deep]

Y3 cluster cosmology are challenging due to high S/N

  • 19 astrophysical parameters describing the connection of measurements and matter fluctuations (linear galaxy bias, intrinsic alignments, mass—observable relations, and projection effects)
     
  • 12 observational parameters describing observational systematics (photometric redshift and shear measurement)

DES standard! 

To+25 (PRD, 112, 063537)

Exhaustively test possible systematics 

Title Text

Subtitle

Simulations (Cardinal, To+24, APJ,961,59) to test cluster finding algorithm. 

To+25 (PRD, 112, 063537)

Cosmological constraints from DES-Y3 assuimg           model.

\Lambda \rm{CDM}

DES cluster

In addition to the 9 modeling tests, we pass an additional 9 null tests.

We unblind!

DES+25 (PRD accepted)

DES cluster

Cosmology constraints (50% improvements relative to DES-Y1): 

 

S_8=0.864\pm 0.04
\Omega_{\rm{m}}=0.27^{+0.02}_{-0.03}

DES+25 (PRD accepted)

Multiwavelength cluster

Detection red galaxy Gas Gas
Mass and redshift low mass high z high mass low z
Analysis Large-scale Small-scale Small-scale

eRASS1

SPT

DES

DES+25 (PRD accepted)

DES internal consistency

Posterior Predictive Distribution (PPD) with a criteria PPD (d1|d2)>0.01.

 

P(cosmic shear | CL+GC, ΛCDM) = 0.04> 0.01
P(cosmic shear + galaxy-galaxy lensing| CL+GC) = 0.07>0.01

 

DES+25

DES+25 (PRD accepted)

All probes combined

DES joint analyses of clusters, galaxies, and weak lensing (CL+3x2pt):

 

S_8=0.81\pm 0.02
\Omega_{\rm{m}}=0.27^{+0.02}_{-0.03}

24% improvements compared to 3x2pt.

DES+25

DES+25 (PRD accepted)

DES+25

Under    CDM    

  • The matter density of the universe from CL+3x2pt is consistent with DES and DESI BAO.
     
  • But is 2.04     lower than DES-Y5 SN.

 

\Lambda
\sigma

DES+25 (PRD accepted)

Actively analyze full DES data

Actively analyze full DES data

Extending the model to test evolving dark energy. 

w0-waCDM model

Stay tuned for the new Y6 constraints! 

DES Y1

DES Y1 reanalysis

Clusters as individual objects

Clusters as part of large-scale structure

cosmo25

By CHUN-HAO TO

cosmo25

  • 60